Archive for the ‘Science’ Category

“Modern” Innovations my Kid may Never Experience Firsthand (outside of a museum)

Sunday, July 22nd, 2007

Dial tone

“Standard” phone ring

Records

Cassette Tapes

CDs

Desktop computer

Live TV

Roaming

Being without a phone

Ethernet

Floppy Disk

Non-hybrid car

$1/gallon gasoline

The evening news

A regular commute

CRTs

Film

VCRs

Rewind to start

Commercial interruptions

Long Distance phone call

Manual car door locks

Turn-key ignition

Spitting watermelon seeds

“Stop wasting film”

7 digit phone numbers

“Reality”

Sunday, May 14th, 2006

AP quotes the first lady as saying she doesn’t believe the President’s poll numbers because when she travels around the country she sees many people who express their appreciation and who tell her to “stay the course.”

Of course this is the beauty of statistics.  Assuming the polls are accurate and representative, with around 300 million people in the United States it’s pretty easy to find some of the 90 million or so who are supportive - especially when the first lady is giving a speach or press conference.

An (illegal) Waste

Friday, May 12th, 2006

Defense Tech has a brief discussion about why the NSA’s massive collection of call records is a completely waste of time.

Elementary my dear Watson

Saturday, April 8th, 2006

A wonderful discovery by Joseph W. Thornton at the University of Oregon shows how a specific stress hormone receptor evolved. Hormone receptors have previously been thought by some to be an irreducible system. Such systems, naysayers argue, provide no function when one component is taken away and thus cannot be created by evolution. This counter argument states that if a system has no beneficial function then it cannot be selected for and will not mutate into the beneficial form. Of course the key that people like Michael J. Behe are missing is that evolution is not a guiding force, rather it describes a observed progression of nature - a mechanism by which genes change over time. Mutations are random and neutral mutations are just as likely to survive as not. One might posit from Thorton’s findings that redundancy can also beneficial and therefore can lead to mutations of the form he discovered: when an accidental replication (perhaps beneficial because of redundancy - Omer) mutates it creates a new function. Genetic Replication may provide the stepping stone that, while too complex for people like Dr. Behe to reduce is completely natural.